Hipster Cutoff

eHow has an article that will tell you exactly how to dress like a hipster. As someone who straddles the line between hipsterdom and… uh, whatever isn’t called “hipster” these days, I feel I’m pretty qualified to help you understand the article a little more deeply. Let’s begin:

You see, nobody shops at vintage stores except for people who want to look “hip”. The fact of the matter is, the whole myth of people being homeless and not having enough money to shop at higher-end retailers is just that—a myth. They don’t exist. And there are especially no broke hipsters. At least not in a country like America, where everyone is wealthy. Therefore, the appearance of frugality is clearly a fashion statement. Also, there’s no actual thrill in finding something awesome that’s only $1.50. The only thrill is in being able to tell your friends that you got that old dress or cardigan for $1.50, and revel in the knowledge that you got the only one available.

You know what’s really cool? Being emaciated. It’s true. Eating disorders are in this season. There aren’t any hipsters that wish they could gain weight either, that aren’t happy that they don’t seem to put on any weight no matter how much they eat. Not one. And so they get thinner and thinner so they can fit into ever tighter pants. Fun fact: wearing black pants was highly unfashionable until hipsters decided it was cool. It’s true! Ask your parents!

Most people don’t know this, but the Smurfs and the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles have been around for decades. Why don’t most people know this, you ask? They weren’t popular! You probably didn’t even know about them until you read this article. Both shows only became well known when companies like Urban Outfitters started putting them on tee shirts. It was only then that childrens’ cartoon shows from the 1980s gained any kind of following because, after all, today’s hipsters were more concerned with looking cool when they were kids and generally found the other kids that watched cartoons to be philistines.

You’d think belts would be a great way to accessorize, but you’d be wrong. Mainly belts act as another way for hipsters to gain attention and admiration from their peer group. The more flashy the belt, the more adoration the hipster garners. Also, I’ll bet you thought that spiked belts were worn by goths and that rhinestone belts were for middle school girls. Nope! Those were the hipsters. You must not have been cool enough to notice.

Converse Chuck Taylor All-Star sneakers were first produced in 1917. However, very few people purchased the shoes and Converse went largely unnoticed for three-quarters of a century, until the year 1994. That year marked the first year that a hipster wore a pair of Chuck Taylors. Due to a resultant explosion in the sneakers’ popularity and despite absolutely no connection with any kind of organized sport, Nike purchased Converse in 2003.

There you have it. Now you know exactly why you should be dressing like a hipster: because if you do, some pretentious asshole may just write a vague article or start a stupid meme blog about you.

Posted in Links | Leave a comment

A Farewell to Harms

A federal judge is scheduled to announce his ruling on the constitutionality of California’s Proposition 8 later today. Here’s a quote from the Wall Street Journal:

Does it, in other words, deny gays and lesbians “equal protection under the laws,” as guaranteed by the 14th Amendment? And does it violate the Due Process Clause by impinging on a “fundamental right” without granting due process under the laws?

And the defense? The Mercury News is on the case:

“A stay is essential to averting the harms that would flow from another purported window of same-sex marriage in California,” [lawyers for the Proposition 8 defense team] wrote.

The defense has yet to comment on exactly what those “harms” are. In a related story, officials are still investigating the simultaneous disappearance of everyone’s common sense and humanity.1

  1. EDIT: I take that back… for now: Judge rules California’s ban on same-sex marriage is unconstitutional.
Posted in News | Leave a comment

Blogs Are Like Books (Sort Of)

According to research about scholarly blogging by Sara Kjellberg:

The blog can be used to [sic] disseminating content, expressing opinions, keeping up-to-date and remembering, writing, interacting, and creating relationships.

Blogs can be treacherously unedited,1 but there are similarities nonetheless:

But often the readers do not interact at all. The perceived readership is highlighted by Yardi, et al. (2009) as an important factor for blogging, and the actual amount of readership can be hard to determine. One of the researchers points out that he thinks that the interaction in blogs is exaggerated and that he experiences that blogging is more of one-way communication than a dialogue.2

You’d think that the advantage of digital media over print media is the collaborative or communicative aspect of it that print doesn’t generally have—real-time comments are possible on blogs in a way that is not when reading a book. But it seems that comments don’t necessarily make blogs that much more collaborative than books are.3 In fact, some view them as a hindrance to the conversation. Take Gruber’s Daring Fireball for recent example:

What I tend to get instead aren’t queries or complaints about the lack of comments, but rather demands that I add them—demands from entitled people who see that I’ve built something very nice that draws much attention, and who believe they have a right to share in it.

They don’t.

He goes on.

Comments, at least on popular websites, aren’t conversations. They’re cacophonous shouting matches.

It is yet to be seen if the rise of blogs will have the same sort of impact as Gutenberg’s printing press, as any educational or informational effects blogs may have could be offset by their seemingly more popular use as a method of disseminating YouTube videos of cats on a mass scale.

  1. The one you’re currently reading, my own, is a useful example of this.
  2. As such, I guess I shouldn’t feel so bad about never receiving any comments on the majority of my posts.
  3. That is to say, conversations occur between blogs, rather than on a single blog.
Posted in Essays | Leave a comment

What Flavor Are You?

Earlier this afternoon I signed up for Flavors.me, to which I feel a need to give a shout-out. I’d heard about it when it first launched, but I don’t know why I didn’t sign up until just now.

If you have an Internet presence that spans a handful of websites, as I do, Flavors.me is a useful, design-y little app that allows you to customize a single page to act as a hub that you can send folks to so they can check out your websites, blogs, or your work. You can even set it up to display your blog’s posts, Twitter feed, and photos (and more) right there on the page. I don’t have it set up to do that, but I could definitely see myself linking to my job’s website (when I become so gainfully employed), my résumé, and my portfolio once I have a more significant body of work.

If you check out their directory, all of the different pages that people have created use the space so uniquely and creatively. It’s as much a human study as it is a design study. It also gave me a great excuse to use a new self-portrait that I took this morning. It’s win-win.

Posted in Links | 1 Comment

Tardiness and Perception of Time

When I was in junior high and high school, I was often tardy to school in the morning. It was probably the most consistent thing about me when I was a young student—my attention and effort certainly were not. I never intentionally skipped school, but my tardiness did put me face to face many times with my very stern housemaster, Mr. Lemire, got me assigned my very own truancy officer, and even landed me in a boardroom-style conference table meeting with a handful of very serious looking people in the Essex County courthouse.

Sound like overkill for a quiet and mild-mannered 12-year-old with absolutely no record of any other kind of misconduct? Yeah, it did to me, too. If only I’d told them this story, the one about how in 1939 George Dantzig proved two previously unproven statistical theorems because he was tardy to class and mistook them for a homework assignment.

Tardiness, it seems, is a distinctly American concept. That isn’t to say that other cultures don’t have a notion of tardiness, but, due to our country’s history of competition and deeply-rooted belief in upward mobility, punctuality has become very important to us as a society:

It’s no longer just fast food restaurants and “democracy” that the United States is exporting—it’s also our anxiety about time. From how business is conducted to the fight to slow the aging process, our unhealthy attitudes are becoming the common thread that ties our flattening world together. [...]

Americans have always been a work-focused people. And despite the fact that this stresses us out immensely (Americans report feeling more stressed than citizens of other nations, and we also suffer from more heart disease and other stress-related health problems than others), we report feeling happiest when at work. In fact, if we had more free time, surveys suggest that the majority of us would fill it with more work.1

I’m currently in the midst of a rigorous job search that has slowed down some since I moved to the DC area. Admittedly, I tend to be a fairly lazy person by nature;2 working has not been my strongest suit.3 I’ve been loving my little post-grad vacation and I’d be perfectly happy to be a stay at home boyfriend (as my last boss suggested I do). But the honest truth is that I’m overwhelmed by not only guilt but also a certain kind of I guess what you’d call greed. I have bills to pay, yes, but also stuff I want to buy. Nothing important. Just stuff. It’s not only me, though. Here in the “first world” we all feel these guilts and desires, whether we have a sense of self-loathing about it or not. Both the guilt and the greed are, I surmise, distinctly part of a collective American consciousness of which, good or bad, I find I am a part. And to tame the guilt and greed associated with needing money, we’re forced to work and, therefore, forced to be punctual.

But I digress. A useful question to ask, I think, is, now that I’m no longer tardy all the time, had I been a more punctual person as a young student, would I have given my studies more attention? And would that have gotten me into a better university? Would that then have made my current job search that much shorter? Or, more to the point, is it even possible to be balanced enough to feel relaxed, but also be punctual and get a lot of work done?

  1. Philip Zimbardo’s delightfully animated talk The Secret Powers of Time explains this concept beautifully as well.
  2. Why do you think I was so consistently tardy? I wasn’t getting out of bed on time.
  3. Though I’d like to think I just haven’t found the right job yet.
Posted in Essays | Leave a comment

Social Media is Anti-Social

The benefit of following strangers on Twitter as explained on Science Blogs:

We naturally lead manicured lives, so that our favorite blogs and writers and friends all look and think and sound a lot like us. (While waiting in line for my cappuccino this weekend, I was ready to punch myself in the face, as I realized that everyone in line was wearing the exact same uniform: artfully frayed jeans, quirky printed t-shirts, flannel shirts, messy hair, etc. And we were all staring at the same gadget, and probably reading the same damn website. In other words, our pose of idiosyncratic uniqueness was a big charade. Self-loathing alert!) While this strategy might make life a bit more comfortable—strangers can say such strange things—it also means that our clichés of free-association get reinforced. We start thinking in ever more constricted ways.

Social media was created, I presume, with the intent to expand or inform our reality. Instead, it assists us in conforming our existing reality to itself (and also stalking the girl in tight jeans who sits at the front of the class in Brit Lit). It reminds me of this article which I’ve posted about before and which addresses the practice of “media fragmentation” to avoid challenging one’s pre-exisiting beliefs.

Is it possible that something like “social” media is ultimately only useful for allowing us to feel safe and comfortable and unchallenged and then, on top of that, is more and more being taken over by marketing machines as a subversive, less threatening way to peddle useless consumer goods to us?

Posted in Media | Leave a comment